Via my Amazon-/Microsoft-/VC-praised work, IDed THREAT that Jeffrey Epstein could be/have-been PART of. Keywords: hypersexuality CORRELATES w/ psychopathy; psychos (Ps) are IMPERILED (4 reasons; keywords: heritable; via molecular genetics, identifiers; police WANT universal genetic databases;...); ~16% Ps’ IQ > 115; ~77M Ps

The below is excerpted from the pdf, minus Web hyperlinks and most formatting of text. --My August 21, 2019 post to r/Epstein on reddit.com-- Title of post (length can't exceed 300 characters): [v2] Via AMZN-/MSFT-/VC-praised work, IDed THREAT that Epstein could be/have-been PART of. Keywords: hypersexuality CORRELATES w/ psychopathy; psychos (Ps) IMPERILED (4 reasons; keywords: heritable; via molecular genetics, identifiers; police WANT universal genetic databases); ~16% Ps' IQ > 115; ~77M Ps Body of post: (v2 = version 2. Thx much for feedback re: v1 bugs.) --Re: 1) links to said praise for my work, 2) hypersexuality correlates strongly with psychopathy-- See below (e.g., via searching for keywords). --Re: THREAT-- (This section and several that follow are excerpted from the 166-page pdf [i.e., this pdf] at [libgen URL provided in said reddit post].) Summary (details below) ~77 million psychopaths (Ps) are IMPERILED (4 reasons). It's likely that many Ps are aware of 1+ of said reasons (~2.3% of Ps have an IQ ≥ 130; ~16% ≥ 115). Many/most/all Ps are DANGEROUS. Worst case: a growing number of Ps are aware that Ps are IMPERILED (PsIMP), and are resisting (e.g., organizing; coercing; equipping to coerce-via-terrorizing; partnering with known groups of violent extremists). History and logic indicate that said worst-case is likely to be in progress. --Re: said worst-case could explain (part of Epstein's life and 100% of his death/escape-- Re: life Keywords: organizing (e.g., being a bank(er) for Ps' resistance), coercing (e.g., "donations" from non-Ps). From the August 11, 2019 article in The New York Times titled "Jeffrey Epstein's Opaque Finances Could Become Focal Point for Investigators": __The money . . . would flow among . . . dozens of bank accounts, shell companies and, at times, charities linked to high-powered friends. From a 2017 report published by the OECD: __[T]errorists need ways to raise, move, conceal and spend money. One of their main means is the use of anonymous "shell companies" . . . From the 2019 article in The Atlantic titled “Russian-Style Kleptocracy Is Infiltrating America”: __"Long before suspicion mounted about the loyalties of Donald Trump, large swaths of the American elite—lawyers, lobbyists, real-estate brokers, politicians in state capitals who enabled the creation of shell companies [my emphasis]—had already proved themselves to be reliable servants of a rapacious global plutocracy." __"If every nation had signed on to the OECD standards, the effect would have been a hammerblow to . . . the vital infrastructure that allows kleptocratic money to flow unnoticed. In the end, the United States was alone in refusing to join the OECD agreement, finalized in 2014." From the August 12, 2019 article in The New York Times titled "The Day Jeffrey Epstein Told Me He Had Dirt on Powerful People": __The overriding impression I took away from our roughly 90-minute conversation was that Mr. Epstein knew an astonishing number of rich, famous and powerful people, and had photos to prove it. He also claimed to know a great deal about these people, some of it potentially damaging or embarrassing, including details about their supposed sexual proclivities and recreational drug use. Re: death/escape (This section is excerpted from below.) All told, it seems at least somewhat likely that Epstein's 2019 arrest/jailing was preceded by: * many Ps organizing re: PsIMP * these Ps knowing that: __A growing number of non-Ps know 1) PsIMP, 2) hypersexuality correlates . . . __These non-Ps are MINDFUL of the worst-case re: extensive linkages among people who are 1) (likely to be) hypersexual, 2) (becoming) wealthy, 3) (very) intelligent. __The more evidence there is of said linkages, the more likely it is that non-Ps' worst-case analyses will catalyze efforts that lead to bad outcomes for Ps . . . So if Epstein testified at length re: said linkages (e.g., links among many people in his black book) . . . So Ps could've organized to prevent . . . — End of the excerpt from below — --Re: PsIMP-- Summary (some details follow; more below) Psychopathy is substantially heritable. Via the burgeoning science of molecular genetics, many/most/all genetic markers for psychopathy will be identified soon. There's been "a rise in calls, particularly in law enforcement, for universal genetic databases, where everyone's biometric data is put in one place," according to a 2019 presentation by a professor of "strategic foresight" who’s an adjunct at the New York University Stern School of Business. Said calls by law enforcement can be expected to continue/increase, not least because: __"[M]ore than 50% of all police officers killed in the line of duty are killed by psychopaths," according to a study cited in a 2011 article. __Psychopaths (Ps) comprise ~1% of humans (i.e., ~77M of 7.7B). __So a P is at least ~50x more likely than a non-P to kill a police officer, all things being otherwise equal. Given said identification of markers, the advent of said databases would IMPERIL Ps. Keywords re: reason 1: "predictive policing." Re: reason 2: "Indefinite detention" of Ps could/should ensue, according to a leading psychopathy researcher who's tenured at the University of Pennsylvania (i.e., Ps who haven't committed a crime could be imprisoned). The other 2 reasons Ps are IMPERILED are premised partly on said identification of markers, but don't require as a pre-condition said advent of databases. Keywords re: reasons 3 & 4: BURGEONING sciences of human reproduction; "superstar-biased" technological change; ongoing build-out of "human-capital" markets (e.g., CE [i.e., customized education], gametes); almost certainly: 1) each P would be unable to reproduce via gaining access to (top-)quality gametes, unless s/he coerced; 2) each P with superstar-level ability would suffer very costly career damage/loss, unless s/he coerced.