The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Rating System for Rollover Resistance: An Assessment

This document was uploaded by one of our users. The uploader already confirmed that they had the permission to publish it. If you are author/publisher or own the copyright of this documents, please report to us by using this DMCA report form.

Simply click on the Download Book button.

Yes, Book downloads on Ebookily are 100% Free.

Sometimes the book is free on Amazon As well, so go ahead and hit "Search on Amazon"

TRB Special Report 265 - An Assessment of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Rating System for Rollover Resistance finds that the static stability factor is a useful indicator of a vehicle's propensity to roll over, but that U.S. government ratings for new cars, light trucks, and sport utility vehicles do not adequately reflect differences in rollover resistance shown by available crash data. According to the report, the five-star system should be revised to allow better discrimination among vehicles and incorporate results from road tests that measure vehicle control and handling characteristics. Following the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's (NHTSA's) issuance of vehicle ratings to inform consumers about rollover risk, Congress requested a TRB study to evaluate the appropriateness of the rating system. Motor vehicle rollovers involving passenger cars, vans, pickup trucks, and sport utility vehicles result in approximately 10,000 deaths and 27,000 serious injuries each year in the United States. NHTSA developed a five-star rating system to inform consumers about the rollover resistance of passenger cars and light-duty passenger vehicle trucks. After thoroughly evaluating NHTSA's development of the rating system, the committee that conducted this study concurred with the agency's reliance on a static measure of vehicle stability but pointed out some inadequacies of the statistical model used to relate this static measure to rollover risk. Alternative statistical approaches would provide a better approximation of risk. The rating system itself was found wanting. The procedures used to develop and test the ratings with consumers through focus groups did not provide credible evidence that consumers understood the message about the actual risk associated with a given vehicle. By being limited to only five levels, the system also discarded valuable information. The data developed by NHTSA could be refined to enable consumers to discriminate better among vehicle models with regard to their rollover experience.

Author(s): National Research Council
Series: Special Report (National Research Council (U.S.). Transportation Research Board), 265.
Publisher: Transportation Research Board
Year: 2002

Language: English
Commentary: 44033
Pages: 144

Rating System for Rollover Resistance......Page 1
The National Academies......Page 3
Preface......Page 5
2002 Executive Committee......Page 10
Executive Summary......Page 11
Introduction......Page 18
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration’s Initiatives on Rollover......Page 19
NHTSA’s Star Ratings for Rollover Resistance......Page 22
Consumer Information on Motor Vehicle Safety......Page 24
Study Approach and Organization of Report......Page 26
Vehicle Dynamics......Page 30
Background......Page 31
Static Measures of Rollover Propensity......Page 33
Need for Dynamic Testing......Page 40
Dynamic Testing: Features and Challenges......Page 43
Findings and Recommendation......Page 45
Statistics and Data Analysis......Page 47
Rollover Crash Data......Page 48
Background and Notation......Page 52
Statistical Models......Page 56
Scenario Effects......Page 63
Rollover Curve and Star Rating System......Page 68
Findings and Recommendations......Page 71
Practicality and Utility of NHTSA’s Rollover Resistance Ratings......Page 73
Availability and Use of NHTSA’s Rollover Resistance Ratings......Page 83
Future Approaches......Page 85
Findings and Recommendations......Page 89
Context......Page 93
Static Stability Factor......Page 94
NHTSA’s Star Ratings for Rollover Resistance......Page 98
Recommendations for a Future Approach......Page 102
Appendixes......Page 9
A Congressional Request for Study......Page 105
B Committee Meetings and Other Activities......Page 106
C Supplementary Statistical Results......Page 109
D Rollover Information from NHTSA’s Website......Page 113
Study Committee Biographical Information......Page 140