For operators of nuclear research facilities, it is of particular importance to investigate minor incidents: indeed, as safety demonstrations are generally based on the presence of several independent "lines of defence", only through attentive investigation of every occurrence, usually minor and of no consequence, can the level of trust placed in each of these defensive lines be confirmed, or the potential risks arising out of a possible weakness in the system be anticipated. The efficiency of the system is based on a rigorous procedure: stringent attention to all incidents, consideration of the potential consequences of the incidents in their most pessimistic scenarios, and promotion of a broad conception of transpositions of the events, in time and space, for experience feedback. This efficiency presumes motivation on the part of all those involved, hence the importance of dissociating from the concept of an "incident" any notion of "error" or "blame" both in internal analysis and in public communications. The nuclear industry has developed some very progressive tools for experience feedback, which could interest also management of other technological risks. This book presents the proceedings of a NATO Advanced Workshop dedicated to this important matter of concern.
Author(s): Francis Lambert, Yuri Volkov
Edition: 1
Year: 2006
Language: English
Pages: 217
1402038860......Page 1
TABLE OF CONTENTS......Page 6
PREFACE......Page 8
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT......Page 10
Practices of the French Atomic Energy Commission......Page 11
A revised approach to the recognition reporting and analysis of minor incidents and mechanisms adopted to cascade the lessons learned......Page 32
3 THE EXPERIENCE OF EMERGENCY SHUTDOWN OF THE VVR-c REACTOR AFTER 40 YEARS OF OPERATION......Page 56
4 MINOR INCIDENTS DURING THE DECOMMISSIONING OF PROTOTYPE OPERATION AND RESEARCH FACILITIES OF THE KARLSRUHE RESEARCH CENTER......Page 75
5 ANALYSIS OF INFORMATION ON INCIDENTS AT RESEARCH NUCLEAR PLANTS IN RUSSIA......Page 87
Practices of the French Atomic Energy Commission......Page 95
French Regulatory Practices......Page 119
8 THE RESPONSIBILITY OF HIGHER MANAGEMENT WITH RESPECT TO THE SAFETY POLICY OF RESEARCH CENTRES......Page 135
9 ORGANIZATION AND METHODS USED BY THE CEA SACLAY CENTRE TO IMPROVE OPERATING PROCEDURES AND PROMOTE BEST PRACTICES IN NUCLEAR RESEARCH FACILITIES......Page 145
10 SAFETY AS AN UNCEASING PROCESS: THE ROLE OF THE HEALTH PHYSICS & SAFETY DEPARTMENT IN A NUCLEAR RESEARCH CENTRE......Page 194
(World’s First Nuclear Power Plant)......Page 204
12 SUMMARY OF THE GENERAL DISCUSSIONS......Page 210
