Rethinking of Coase Theorem: Externalities and Uncertainty

This document was uploaded by one of our users. The uploader already confirmed that they had the permission to publish it. If you are author/publisher or own the copyright of this documents, please report to us by using this DMCA report form.

Simply click on the Download Book button.

Yes, Book downloads on Ebookily are 100% Free.

Sometimes the book is free on Amazon As well, so go ahead and hit "Search on Amazon"

Научная статья. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 2015, 5(4), pp. 875-883.
A behaviour of economic agents in many respects depends on taking into account those conditions that have appeared around them. Traditionally, to such conditions, researchers have referred the uncertainty and factors of the institutional control, often projected on a value of the transaction costs. Studies in stimulants for any form of the agents’ behaviour lead us to an analysis of the Coase theorem, which is expected to explain a number of similar regularities. However, ambiguous approaches to the theorem interpretation generate conflicts in a perception and identification of externalities. It is a solution to this challenge, which is a focus of this research. In a critical review of works by Coase and his followers, the theorem statement has been made clearer; we have also put forward a hypothesis on an origin of the externalities and introduced additional criteria to identify them. The paper has given a scientific rationale for an author's assumption that the utility of impure goods depends on the vector of the externalities, which ultimately determines the stratification in a field of the externalities (positive or negative).
Keywords: Externalities, Coase Theorem, Uncertainty.
Content:.
Introduction.
Literature review.
The theorem interpretation.
Coase view of the transaction costs and the Externalities.
Original wording for the theorem.
Provisions of Coase’s theory.
Methods.
The basic criteria to classify the externalities.
Contradictions in methodology and hypothesis.
Discussion.
Conclusion.

Author(s): Kuzmin E.A., Semyonovykh S.M.

Language: English
Commentary: 1787790
Tags: Финансово-экономические дисциплины;Институциональная экономика