"The scope of criminal justice has to include the body of equal norms which have to be protected. The basic elements of authoritarianism, universality, complementarity, and pluralism should not be employed by superior powers and enforced within the procedures and values of our criminal charter. A pure criminal jurisdiction ought to have its own independent honour and its own unified diverse values including: righteousness, innocence, virtue, honesty, and the preservation of objectivity in legal judgments. At the same time, the notion of diversity should not create an artificial equality in place of authentic, dynamic protection. It is of no essential significance which criminal justice measures are exercised by a court if the rulings of the court are based on clear evidence, and most importantly, if the court has not granted immunity for major criminals through impunity as a result of corrupt proceedings. It is the independent character of criminal justice which earns it its high level of respect. The existence of pure values is the natural and essential requirement for a court and allows it to be qualified as a body with ethical and moral character. A court should not be run through the threat of force or through monopolisation, but rather with trust. Furthermore, the courts are morally required to resist enmeshing themselves in the authoritarian exploitation of criminal justice. Working towards this goal should be imperative in the mechanism of criminal jurisprudence. This is the most plausible method for decreasing the number of victims of core international crimes and achieving pluralist values of diversity"--
Author(s): Farhad Malekian
Series: Law, Crime and Law Enforcement
Publisher: Nova Science Publishers
Year: 2021
Language: English
Pages: 299
City: New York
Contents
Preface
About the Book
Chapter 1
Enlightenment through Pluralism
1.1. Mechanism of Irresponsibility
1.2. Misusing Pluralism
1.3. Complications Contradicting Pluralism
1.4. Political Philosophy
1.5. Regional Dependency of Political Values
1.6. Supporting and Undermining Pluralism
1.7. Theoretical Utopian Disputes
1.8. Virtue of Pluralism in the Legal Discipline
1.9. Islamic Complexity in the Ideological System
1.10. Diversity as United Respect
1.11. Universalism
Chapter 2
The Borderline of International Criminal Diversity
2.1. Touchstone of Pluralism within ICL
2.2. Critical Position of the Complementarity Principle
2.3. Rejection of Pluralism as an Epidemic
2.4. Exploitation of Pluralism
2.5. Brutality against Diversity
2.6. Criticism of Pluralist Norms
2.7. Restoration by Pluralist Values
2.8. A Pluralistic Uniformity Contract
2.9. Enlightenment of Criminal Justice
2.10. The Heart of Diversity
2.11. Facing Serious Issues of Western Nations
Chapter 3
Challenges against Pluralism
3.1. Neutralising Cosmopolitan Values with Weapons
3.2. The Barbaric Veto
3.3. Abuse of Pluralism through the Possession of Weapons
3.4. Security Council Racing Values of Pluralism
3.5. Horizontal and Parallel Disputes
3.6. Toggling Justice with Authoritarian Injustice
3.7. Ornamental Pluralism of Lawyers
3.8. Confronting the Dispute of Criminal Responsibility
3.9. Inflexibility of Criminal Justice via Pluralism
3.10. Pluralism through the Opus of Natural Law
3.11. Mutual Consciousness of Pluralism
3.12. Ethical Reasoning beyond Pluralism
Chapter 4
Orchestrating Pluralist Criminal Justice
4.1. Heterogeneous Melodies of Pluralism
4.2. Evacuating Pluralist Criminal Justice
4.3. Margin of Selectivity of Pluralism
4.4. Selectivity Ensuring Impunity in the ICC
4.5. Security Council Contesting the Opus of Diversity
4.6. Organs Constituting Opponents of Justice
4.7. Language of Legal Pluralism in Criminal Justice
4.8. Multiple Coexisting Norms
4.9. Comparative Concept of International Criminal Norms
4.10. Control of Complementarity’s Plurality
4.11. Control of Unified Values
Chapter 5
Pluralist Classification of International Criminal Justice
5.1. Authoritarian System of Criminal Justice
5.2. Authoritarian Reasonings of Criminal Justice
5.3. Pluralist System of International Criminal Justice
5.4. Knocking Down the Notion of Complementarity
5.5. United Plurality of Values Preventing Violations
5.6. Unequal Wings of Criminal Justice
5.7. Little-Pluralism of Criminal Justice
5.8. Big Musicians of Criminal Justice
5.9. Combat for Operative Values
5.10. Appropriate Normative Response to Authoritarian Principles
Chapter 6
Margin of Appreciation of Criminal Justice
6.1. Jus Cogens Pluralism
6.2. Civilization Values as Pluralism
6.3. Use of Force against Pluralist Views
6.4. Margin of Sale of Legal Disciplines
6.5. Pluralist or Non-Pluralist Criminal Justice Norms
6.6. Objects of Dictated Opus of Criminal Justice
6.7. Margin of Appreciation of Pluralist Criminal Justice
6.8. Margin of Appreciation for the Complementarity of Criminal Justice
6.9. Debatable Codification of Criminal Justice
6.10. Musical Aspiration of International Criminal Justice
Chapter 7
Disputing over Mutual Criminal Justice
7.1. Confronting Authoritarian Power in Criminal Justice
7.2. Unified Collective Recognition of Criminal Justice
7.3. Incompetence of Domestic Criminal Justice
7.4. Pluralist Values Condemning the Possession of Atomic Bombs
7.5. Workable Argumentation in Criminal Justice
7.6. Indispensible Values of Human Rights
7.7. Avoiding Inaccessibility of Criminal Justice
7.8. The Puzzles of International Criminal Methods
7.9. Plague on Criminal Judgements
7.10. Tolerating a Diversity of Criminal Norms
7.11. Care in the Adoption of the Margin of Appreciation
Chapter 8
Common Values of Criminal Justice
8.1. Evaluation of Absolute Pluralism
8.2. Virtue of International Character of Common Values
8.3. Misuse of Pluralism by Power Politics
8.4. 90% Off on Criminal Justice
8.5. Policy of Non-Pluralisation
8.6. Imperative Categorical Values
8.7. Lack of Authenticity of the Complementarity Principle
8.8. Misevaluation of Criminal Justice by the ICC
8.9. Extensive Questions of Wholesome Criminal Justice
Conclusion
Referencesâ€
Index
Blank Page
