How did openness become a foundational value for the networks of the twenty-first century? Open Standards and the Digital Age answers this question through an interdisciplinary history of information networks that pays close attention to the politics of standardization. For much of the twentieth century, information networks such as the monopoly Bell System and the American military's Arpanet were closed systems subject to centralized control. In the 1970s and 1980s however, engineers in the United States and Europe experimented with design strategies to create new digital networks. In the process, they embraced discourses of 'openness' to describe their ideological commitments to entrepreneurship, technological innovation, and participatory democracy. The rhetoric of openness has flourished - for example, in movements for open government, open source software, and open access publishing - but such rhetoric also obscures the ways the Internet and other 'open' systems still depend heavily on hierarchical forms of control.
Author(s): Andrew L. Russell
Series: Cambridge Studies In The Emergence Of Global Enterprise
Edition: 1
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Year: 2014
Language: English
Commentary: TruePDF
Pages: 325
Tags: Standardization: United States: History; Information Technology; Standards: United States: History; Telecommunication: Standards: United States: History
Cover
Half Title
Series Title
Title
Copyright
Dedication
Contents
Tables and Figures
Acknowledgments
List of acronyms
1 | Introduction
2 | Ideological Origins of Open Standards I: Telegraph and Engineering Standards, 1860s–1900s
3 | Ideological Origins of Open Standards II: American Standards, 1910s–1930s
4 | Standardization and the Monopoly Bell System, 1880s–1930s
5 | Critiques of Centralized Control, 1930s–1970s
6 | International Standards for the Convergence of Computers and Communications, 1960s–1970s
7 | Open Systems and the Limits of Democratic Design, 1970s–1980s
8 | The Internet and the Advantages of Autocratic Design, 1970s–1990s
9 | Conclusion
Bibliography
Index