Unmanned combat air vehicles, or in common parlance 'drones', have become a prominent instrument in US efforts to counter an objective (and subjective) cross-border terrorist threat with lethal force. As a result, critical questions abound on the legitimacy of their use. In a series of multidisciplinary essays by scholars with an extensive knowledge of international norms, this book explores the question of legitimacy through the conceptual lenses of legality, morality and efficacy, it then closes with the consideration of a policy proposal aimed at incorporating all three indispensable elements. The importance of this inquiry cannot be overstated. Non-state actors fully understand that attacking the much more powerful state requires moving the conflict away from the traditional battlefield where they are at an enormous disadvantage. Those engaging in terrorism seek to goad the ruling government into an overreaction, or abuse of power, to trigger a destabilization via an erosion of its legitimacy. Thus defending the target of legitimacy”in this case, insuring the use of deadly force is constrained by valid limiting principles”represents an essential strategic interest. This book seeks to come to grips with the new reality of drone warfare by exploring if it can be used to preserve, rather than eat away at, legitimacy. After an extensive analysis of the three key parameters in twelve chapters, the practical proposition of establishing a 'Drone Court' is put forward and examined as a way of pursuing the goal of integrating these essential components to defend the citizenry and the legitimacy of the government at the same time.
Author(s): Steven J. Barela
Series: Emerging Technologies, Ethics And International Affairs
Edition: 1
Publisher: Routledge | Taylor & Francis Group
Year: 2016
Language: English
Commentary: TruePDF
Pages: 433
Tags: Uninhabited Combat Aerial Vehicles (International Law)
Cover
Half title
Series title
Title
Copyright
Dedication
Contents
List of Figures and Tables
Acknowledgments
About the Contributors
List of Abbreviations
Introduction | Legitimacy as a Target
Section I | Through the Lens of Legality —Formal Validity
1 | Jus ad Bellum: Crossing Borders to Wage War against Individuals
2 | Who Can Be Killed?: Legal Targets in Non-International Armed Conflicts
3 | Boundaries of the Battlefield: The Geographical Scope of the Laws of War
4 | Lethal Force and Drones: The Human Rights Question
Section II | Through the Lens of Morality —Axiological Validity
5 | Old Ideas in New Skins: The Sixteenth Century Debate on Artillery
6 | The Question of “Imminence”: A Historical View on Anticipatory Attacks
7 | Correcting the Record: Civilians, Proportionality, and the Jus ad Vim
8 | From Just War to Clean War: The Impact of Modern Technology on Military Ethics
Section III | Through the Lens of Efficacy —Empirical Validity
9 | Data on Leadership Targeting and Potential Impacts for Communal Support
10 | Tactical Efficacy: “Notorious” UCAVs and Lawfare
11 | Strategic Efficacy: The Opinion of Security and a Dearth of Data
12 | Systemic Efficacy: “Potentially Shattering Consequences for International Law”
Section IV | Creating a Drone Court —Integration via a Policy Proposal
13 | Establishment of a Drone Court: A Necessary Restraint on Executive Power
14 | Can UCAVs be Reconciled with Liberal Governance?: The Substantive Law of a Drone Court
Conclusion | Defending Legitimacy
Index