This report examines, based on key instruments of international law, whether Israel has established an apartheid regime that oppresses and dominates the Palestinian people as a whole. Having established that
the crime of apartheid has universal application, that the question of the status of the Palestinians as a people is settled in law, and that the crime of apartheid should be considered at the level of the State, the report sets out to demonstrate how Israel has imposed such a system on the Palestinians in order to maintain the domination of one racial group over others.
A history of war, annexation and expulsions, as well as a series of practices, has left the Palestinian people fragmented into four distinct population groups, three of them (citizens of Israel, residents of East Jerusalem and the populace under occupation in the West Bank and Gaza) living under direct Israeli rule and the remainder, refugees and involuntary exiles, living beyond.This fragmentation, coupled with the application of discrete bodies of law to those groups, lie at the heart of the apartheid regime.They serve to enfeeble opposition to it and to veil its very existence.This report concludes, on the basis of overwhelming evidence, that Israel is guilty of the crime of apartheid, and urges swift action to oppose and end it.
E/ESCWA/ECRI/2017/1
Author(s): UN Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia, Richard Falk, Virginia Tilley
Series: Palestine and the Israeli Occupation, Issue No. 1
Edition: E/ESCWA/ECRI/2017/1
Publisher: United Nations
Year: 2017
Language: English
Commentary: report pulled from the web
Pages: 65
City: Beirut
Tags: Israel, Palestine, occupied Palestinian Territory, Aparthied, South Africa, UN report
Acknowledgements
Preface
Executive Summary
Introduction
1. The Legal Context Short History of the Prohibition of Apartheid
Alternative definitions of apartheid
2. Testing for an Apartheid Regime in Israel-Palestine
A. The political geography of apartheid
B. Israel as a racial State
C. Apartheid through fragmentation
D. Counter-arguments
3. Conclusions and Recommendations
A. Conclusions
B. Recommendations
Annex I. Findings of the 2009 HSRC Report
Annex II. Which Country?