Major approaches to law and public policy, ranging from law and economics to the fundamental rights approach to constitutional law, are based on the belief that the identification of the correct social goals or values is the key to describing or prescribing law and public policy outcomes. In this book, Neil Komesar argues that this emphasis on goal choice ignores an essential element—institutional choice. Indeed, as important as determining our social goals is deciding which institution is best equipped to implement them—the market, the political process, or the adjucative process.
Pointing out that all three institutions are massive, complex, and imperfect, Komesar develops a strategy for comparative institutional analysis that assesses variations in institutional ability. He then powerfully demonstrates the value of this analytical framework by using it to examine important contemporary issues ranging from tort reform to constitution-making.
Author(s): Neil K. Komesar
Publisher: University of Chicago Press
Language: English
Pages: 295
Tags: Law, Jurisprudence, Economic Analysis, Komesar, Comparative Institutional Analysis
Contents
Preface
Part I: Deciding Who Decides: The Comparative Analysis of Institutional Performance
1 Taking Institutional Choice Seriously
2 Social Goals and Public Policies: Bridging the Gap between Them
Part II: Who Plays, Who Doesn't: The Participation-Centered Approach to The Political Process, The Market, and The Courts
3 Political Process: The Power of the Few and the Power of the Many
4 The Market Process: Transaction Costs and Transaction Benefits
5 The Courts as an Institution: The Structure and Scale of Justice
Part III: Applications: Weighing The Relative Merits of Institutions
6 Safety, Tort Law, and Tort Reform
7 Constitutional Law and Constitution Making
8 American Constitutional Law: The Contours of Judicial Review
9 Summary and Conclusion: Propositions, Audiences, and Reformations
Author Index
Subject Index
