Fair Enough? proposes and tests a new framework for studying attitudes toward redistributive social policies. These attitudes, the book argues, are shaped by at least two motives. First, people support policies that increase their own expected income. Second, they support policies that move the status quo closer to what is prescribed by shared norms of fairness. In most circumstances, saying the “fair thing” is easier than reasoning according to one's pocketbook. But there are important exceptions: when policies have large and certain pocketbook consequences, people take the self-interested position instead of the 'fair' one. Fair Enough? builds on this simple framework to explain puzzling attitudinal trends in post-industrial democracies including a decline in support for redistribution in Great Britain, the erosion of social solidarity in France, and a declining correlation between income and support for redistribution in the United States.
Author(s): Charlotte Cavaillé
Series: Cambridge Studies in Comparative Politics
Edition: 1
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Year: 2023
Language: English
Pages: xiv; 276
City: New York
Tags: Distribution (Economic theory); Equality; Political Economy; Politics and International Relations; Comparative Politics;
List of Figures page viii
List of Tables xi
Acknowledgments xii
1 Demand for Redistribution in the Age of Inequality 1
PART I Demand for Redistribution: A Conceptual Framework
2 What Is Fair? 29
3 Unpacking Demand for Redistribution 53
4 As If Self-interested? The Correlates of Fairness Beliefs 86
5 When Material Self-interest Trumps Fairness Reasoning 101
PART II Changes in Demand for Redistribution
6 Explaining Stability and Change 127
7 Fiscal Stress and the Erosion of Social Solidarity 142
8 Partisan Dynamics and Mass Attitudinal Change 164
9 How Proportionality Beliefs Form 203
10 The Nature and Origins of Reciprocity Beliefs 220
Conclusion 242
References 255
Index 270