EEG Signature and Phenomenology of Alpha/theta Neurofeedback Training Versus Mock Feedback

This document was uploaded by one of our users. The uploader already confirmed that they had the permission to publish it. If you are author/publisher or own the copyright of this documents, please report to us by using this DMCA report form.

Simply click on the Download Book button.

Yes, Book downloads on Ebookily are 100% Free.

Sometimes the book is free on Amazon As well, so go ahead and hit "Search on Amazon"

Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, Vol. 27, No. 4, December 2002 ( C ° 2002)
Alpha/theta (a/t) neurofeedback training has in the past successfully been used as a complementary
therapeutic relaxation technique in the treatment of alcoholism. In spite of positive
clinical outcomes, doubts have been cast on the protocol’s specificity when compared to
alternative relaxation regimes. This study investigated the basic tenet underlying the a/t
training rationale, that accurate a/t feedback representation facilitates the generation of
these frequency components. Two groups of healthy volunteers were randomly assigned
to either (a) real contingent a/t feedback training or (b) a noncontingent mock feedback
control condition. The groups were compared on measures of theta/alpha (t /a) ratios within
and across training sessions, as well as activational self-report scales after each session.
The contingent a/t feedback group displayed significant within-session t /a ratio increments
not evident in the mock control group, as well as higher overall t /a ratios in some but not all
of the training sessions. No differences were found between the groups in terms of subjective
activational phenomenology, in that both groups reported significantly lower levels of
activation after training sessions. The data demonstrate that irrespective of considerations
of clinical relevance, accurate a/t neurofeedback effectively facilitates production of higher
within-session t /a ratios than do noncontingent feedback relaxation.

Author(s): Egner T.

Language: English
Commentary: 1176608
Tags: Приборостроение;Обработка сигналов