"The acceleration versus enrichment controversy has existed virtually for as long as there have been sizable schools. Early entrance and ‘‘double promotions’’ seemed more natural in the context of the one-room schoolhouse than they do today. The issue has led to a great deal of argument, most of it unsupported by firm empirical evidence. Seldom is it even recognized explicitly that there are about as many different ways to speed up the educational progress of an intellectually talented youth as there are ways to ‘“‘enrich”’ his or her educational experiences (e.g., see Stanley 1978 for a list of the former). It was the purpose of the 1977 American Educational Research Association symposium, on which this book is based, to explore the situation from many points of view and to see what studies thus far indicate. We were fortunate to assemble an outstanding panel and to provide its members in advance with some of the most relevant literature, including a rather thorough survey prepared by Stephen P. Daurio especially for this symposium. We hope that this volume will steady the keel a bit by counteracting unsupported statements that favor either point of view. This does not mean we are neutral, however. In our opinion, empirical evidence strongly supports the value of letting intellectually brilliant youths move ahead educationally at *their own* preferred rates, rather than being held to the lock step age-in-grade pace that characterizes most schools."
Author(s): William C. George, Sanford J. Cohn, Julian C. Stanley
Series: Annual Hyman Blumberg Symposia on Research in Early Childhood Education
Publisher: The Johns Hopkins University Press
Year: 1979
Language: English
Commentary: previous: _Women and the Mathematical Mystique_
Pages: 248
Tags: education, psychology, intelligence, SMPY, childhood development, education, Johns Hopkins University, acceleration vs enrichment, Renzulli, career counseling, grade-skipping
- Contributors
- Preface
I. Acceleration and Enrichment: A Controversy in Perspective
1. "Acceleration and Enrichment: Drawing the Base Lines for Further Study", Sanford J. Cohn
2. "Educational Enrichment versus Acceleration: A Review of the Literature", Stephen P. Daurio
II. Enrichment: Highlights of the Literature
3. "What Provisions for the Education of Gifted Students?", Morris Meister and Harold A. Odell
4. "Excerpt from _The Enrichment Triad Model: A Guide for Developing Defensible Programs for the Gifted_", Joseph S. Renzulli
5. "Career Education for Gifted Preadolescents", Lynn H. Fox
6. "Enrichment", Dean A. Worcester
III. Acceleration: Highlights of the Literature
7. "The Problem of School Acceleration", Lewis M. Terman and Melita H. Oden
8. "Outcomes and Concomitants of Acceleration in College", Sidney L. Pressey
9. "A Summing Up", Fund for the Advancement of Education
10. "High School Performance of Underage Pupils Initially Admitted to Kindergarten on the Basis of Physical and Psychological Examinations", James R. Hobson
11. "Identifying and Nurturing the Intellectually Gifted", Julian C. Stanley
IV. Symposium
12. "Educational Acceleration of Intellectually Talented Youths: Prolonged Discussion by a Varied Group of Professionals"; Sanford J. Cohn, William C. George, and Julian C. Stanley, editors
- Name Index