Drugs and Justice: Seeking a Consistent, Coherent, Comprehensive Views

This document was uploaded by one of our users. The uploader already confirmed that they had the permission to publish it. If you are author/publisher or own the copyright of this documents, please report to us by using this DMCA report form.

Simply click on the Download Book button.

Yes, Book downloads on Ebookily are 100% Free.

Sometimes the book is free on Amazon As well, so go ahead and hit "Search on Amazon"

This compact and innovative book tackles one of the central issues in drug policy: the lack of a coherent conceptual structure for thinking about drugs. Drugs generally fall into one of seven categories: prescription, over the counter, alternative medicine, common-use drugs like alcohol, tobacco and caffeine; religious-use, sports enhancement; and of course illegal street drugs like cocaine and marijuana. Our thinking and policies varies wildly from one to the other, with inconsistencies that derive more from cultural and social values than from medical or scientific facts. Penalties exist for steroid use, while herbal remedies or cold medication are legal. Native Americans may legally use peyote, but others may not. Penalties may vary for using different forms of the same drug, such as crack vs. powder cocaine. Herbal remedies are unregulated by the FDA; but medical marijuana is illegal in most states. Battin and her contributors lay a foundation for a wiser drug policy by promoting consistency and coherency in the discussion of drug issues and by encouraging a unique dialogue across disciplines. The contributors are an interdisciplinary group of scholars mostly based at the University of Utah, and include a pharmacologist, a psychiatrist, a toxicologist, a trial court judge, a law professor, an attorney, a diatary specialist, a physician, a health expert on substance abuse, and Battin herself who is a philosopher. They consider questions like the historical development of current policy and the rationales for it; scientific views on how drugs actually cause harm; how to define the key notions of harm and addiction; and ways in which drug policy can be made more consistent. They conclude with an examination of the implications of a consistent policy for various disciplines and society generally. The book is written accessibly with little need for expert knowledge, and will appeal to a diverse audience of philosophers, bioethicists, clinicians, policy makers, law enforcement, legal scholars and practitioners, social workers, and general readers, as well as to students in areas like pharmacy, medicine, law, nursing, sociology, social work, psychology, and bioethics.

Author(s): Margaret Pabst Battin, Erik Luna, Arthur G. Lipman, Paul M. Gahlinger, Douglas E. Rollins
Edition: 1
Year: 2007

Language: English
Pages: 312

0195321014......Page 1
Contents......Page 26
Foreword......Page 6
Contributors......Page 28
1 Drugs “Across the Board”......Page 32
2 How Did It Come to Be This Way?......Page 58
3 Drug Regulatory Agencies and the Underlying Rationales for Drug Policy......Page 84
4 Core Conceptual Problems: Addiction......Page 119
5 Core Conceptual Problems: Harm (and Benefit)......Page 160
6 Dilemmas of Drug Management and Control......Page 204
7 Toward Justice in Drug Theory, Policy, and Practice......Page 255
Bibliography......Page 288
A......Page 300
C......Page 301
D......Page 302
F......Page 303
J......Page 304
N......Page 305
P......Page 306
S......Page 307
X......Page 308