About the form of the Uralic direct object

This document was uploaded by one of our users. The uploader already confirmed that they had the permission to publish it. If you are author/publisher or own the copyright of this documents, please report to us by using this DMCA report form.

Simply click on the Download Book button.

Yes, Book downloads on Ebookily are 100% Free.

Sometimes the book is free on Amazon As well, so go ahead and hit "Search on Amazon"

Tartu: University of Tartu, 2009. — 10 p.
For some time already I have been of an opinion that in Finno-Ugric languages there are no traces of a Common Finno-Ugric (Uralic) accusative suffix *-m that can be interpreted as unique. In a few Lapp (Saami) dialects there is an accusative with the suffix (*)-m, in Mari – with the suffix -m and in a few Mansi dialects – with the suffix -m(V) but the origin of those accusatives can more likely have other explanations than their descent from the Common Finno-Ugric (Uralic) accusative suffix *-m. On the other hand, in Samoyed languages there undoubtedly is the Common Samoyed accusative with the suffix (*)-m.

Author(s): Künnap Ago.

Language: English
Commentary: 1919343
Tags: Языки и языкознание;Лингвистика;Уральское языкознание