A Dialogue About Principle and a Principled Dialogue: Justice Iacobucci’s Substantive Approach to Dialogue

This document was uploaded by one of our users. The uploader already confirmed that they had the permission to publish it. If you are author/publisher or own the copyright of this documents, please report to us by using this DMCA report form.

Simply click on the Download Book button.

Yes, Book downloads on Ebookily are 100% Free.

Sometimes the book is free on Amazon As well, so go ahead and hit "Search on Amazon"

University of Toronto Law Journal, Volume 57, Number 2, Spring
2007, pp. 449-477 (Article)
Published by University of Toronto Press
Frank Iacobucci played the lead role in introducing the
metaphor of judicial review as a form of dialogue between
courts and legislatures into Canadian constitutional law.
He discussed dialogue in reference to interpreting both
rights and limitations under the Canadian Charter of Rights
and Freedoms, but also in relation to devising remedies
under the Charter and using the s. 33 override. Justice
Iacobucci’s interest in dialogue was not, however, limited
to these many different aspects of Charter adjudication.
He recognized the importance of dialogue between courts
and legislatures with respect to the development of the
common law and in the interpretation of statutes.

Author(s): Roach K.

Language: English
Commentary: 618251
Tags: Юридические дисциплины;Права человека