32nd Annual Clinical Aphasiology Conference: A Special Issue of Aphasiology

This document was uploaded by one of our users. The uploader already confirmed that they had the permission to publish it. If you are author/publisher or own the copyright of this documents, please report to us by using this DMCA report form.

Simply click on the Download Book button.

Yes, Book downloads on Ebookily are 100% Free.

Sometimes the book is free on Amazon As well, so go ahead and hit "Search on Amazon"

The papers that appear in this special edition of Aphasiology were selected based upon their theoretical importance, clinical relevance, and scientific merit, from among the many platform and poster presentations comprising the 32nd Annual Clinical Aphasiology Conference held in Ridgedale, Missouri in June of 2002. Each paper was peer-reviewed by the Editorial Consultants and Associate Editors acknowledged herein consistent with the standards of Aphasiology and the rigours of merit review that represent this indexed, archival journal.

Author(s): Patrick Doyle
Series: Special Issues of Aphasiology
Edition: 1
Publisher: Psychology Press
Year: 2003

Language: English
Pages: 145

Book Cover......Page 1
Title......Page 2
CONTENTS......Page 3
Preface......Page 9
Right hemisphere syndrome is in the eye of the beholder......Page 10
METHOD......Page 12
ANALYSES AND RESULTS......Page 14
CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS......Page 17
APPENDIX A......Page 19
APPENDIX B......Page 21
A comparison of the relative effects of phonologic and semantic cueing treatments......Page 23
Participant......Page 25
Treatments......Page 27
RESULTS......Page 28
CONCLUSIONS......Page 29
REFERENCES......Page 31
APPENDIX A EXPERIMENTAL STIMULI......Page 32
Phonologic cueing treatment (PCT)......Page 33
Measures of lexical diversity in aphasia......Page 35
Participants......Page 39
Language elicitation and transcription......Page 40
Relationships among D, NDW, and TTR......Page 41
Lexical diversity in adults with fluent vs nonfluent aphasia......Page 42
DISCUSSION......Page 43
REFERENCES......Page 46
Limb apraxia, pantomine, and lexical gesture in aphasic speakers: Preliminary findings......Page 48
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY......Page 53
Procedure......Page 55
Data analysis......Page 56
RESULTS......Page 57
DISCUSSION......Page 59
REFERENCES......Page 61
List of conversation questions......Page 63
Teaching self-cues: A treatment approach for verbal naming......Page 64
Participant......Page 67
Oral language and speech production......Page 68
Written language comprehension......Page 69
Previous and concurrent treatments......Page 71
Experimental stimuli......Page 72
Treatment application......Page 73
Baseline phase......Page 74
Reliability......Page 75
Treatment......Page 76
Maintenance......Page 77
Generalisation......Page 78
DISCUSSION......Page 79
REFERENCES......Page 82
APPENDIX B MODIFIED CUEING HIERARCHY......Page 83
APPENDIX D STIMULI FOR GENERALIZATION PROBE......Page 84
Functional measures of naming in aphasia: Word retrieval in confrontation naming versus connected speech......Page 86
Tasks......Page 90
Data analyses......Page 91
Relationships among speaking contexts and grammatical class......Page 93
% Corrected Errors......Page 94
DISCUSSION......Page 96
Clinical utility: Feasibility and reliability......Page 97
Relationships among contexts......Page 99
Supplementary measures......Page 101
Conclusion......Page 102
REFERENCES......Page 103
APPENDIX %WR SCORING PROTOCOL......Page 106
Narrative and conversational discourse ofadults with closed head injuries and non-brain-injured adults: A discriminantanalysis......Page 108
Participants......Page 112
Analyses of story narratives......Page 113
Analyses of conversation......Page 114
Story narrative measures......Page 115
Conversation measures......Page 116
Story narrative and conversation measures......Page 117
DISCUSSION......Page 118
REFERENCES......Page 120
Relationship between discourse and Western Aphasia Battery performance in African Americans with aphasia......Page 123
Discourse tasks......Page 126
Analysis......Page 127
RESULTS......Page 129
DISCUSSION......Page 133
REFERENCES......Page 135
Coherence......Page 136
Emplotment......Page 137
The inter-rater reliability of the story retell procedure......Page 138
Participants......Page 140
Procedures......Page 142
RESULTS......Page 143
REFERENCES......Page 144