Management of Science-Intensive Organizations: Catalyzing Urban Resilience

Preface
References
Contents
List of Tables
Part I Theoretical Framework for Science-Intensive Organizations
1 Research Questions and Frameworks
1 Issues Present
2 Urban Resilience and Science-Intensive Organizations
2.1 Previous Literature and Positioning of the Study
2.2 Management Theories Coherent with Resilience Studies
2.2.1 Resource-Based View, Dynamic Capability, Corporate Entrepreneurship
2.2.2 Organization Behaviors, Evolution, and Strategic Reorientation
2.2.3 Corporate Entrepreneurship
2.2.4 Industrial Organizations and Market of Technology
2.2.5 Ecological Approach
2.3 Anchor Firms and Knowledge-Intensive Organizations
2.4 Environmental Exposure and Inequity
2.5 Anticipation and Citizen Scientists’ Movement
2.6 The Missing Link with Science-Intensive Organizations
3 Categorization of Industrial Sciences
3.1 From Emerging Sciences to Technological Capabilities
4 Organizational Forms to Broaden Beneficiaries
References
2 Urban Resilience and Opportunity Identification of Social Entrepreneurs
1 Why Urban Resilience Matters?
2 Facilitators
2.1 Structural and Strategic Contexts of Anchor Corporations
2.1.1 An Example of Structural Contexts: Monoclonal Antibodies
2.2 External Disturbance and Corporate Entrepreneurship
2.2.1 Corporate Entrepreneurship
2.2.2 Corporate Entrepreneurship by Crossing Borders
2.2.3 Subsequent Competition that Affects Types of Entrepreneurship
2.2.4 Again, Categorization of Industrial Sciences
3 Constraints
3.1 Internal Structural and Strategic Contexts
3.2 Resource Allocation to Risky Investment
4 Governance and Boundaries
4.1 Governance Structure as the Internal Structural Contexts
4.2 Loose Coupling
Appendix
References
3 Emerging Technologies and Organizations for Urban Resilience
1 Emergence of New Technologies
2 Academic Knowledge-Intensive Organizations
2.1 Motivation for Research Investment
2.1.1 Remained Problems
2.1.2 The Need of Systems Approach
2.2 Resource Allocation and Performance
2.2.1 The Potential of Academic-Specific Contributions
2.3 Relations with Beneficiaries’ Preferences
2.3.1 Contribution to a Variety
3 Anchor Institutions
3.1 Motivation
3.1.1 Mark II Industrial Science Category and Variety
3.1.2 The Need for Systems Approach
3.2 Resource Allocation and Performance
3.2.1 Technological Discontinuity and Strategic Integration
3.3 Relations with Beneficiaries’ Preferences
4 Set Conditions
References
Part II Entrepreneurship in Urban Resilience
4 Addressing Environmental Inequity by New Sciences
1 When Anchor Institutions Are Absent
2 Environmental Inequity
2.1 Environmental Inequity
2.1.1 Resilience in the 1990s
2.2 Consequences of Reinforced Environmental Inequity
3 Attracting Foreign Anchors
3.1 Outline of the Case
3.1.1 The difference from the Resilience of New York City
3.1.2 Trajectories to Focus on the Environment Startups
3.1.3 Incubating Environmental Startups
3.1.4 The Anchors’ Investment
3.2 Seeking New Attributes of Industrial Sciences
4 Investment Toward Variety
References
5 Emergence and Dynamism of New Material Sciences
1 Schumpeterian Mark II Category
2 Variation and Capability Renewal
2.1 Variation
2.2 Definition of Variety
2.2.1 Replicator Dynamics
2.2.2 Differentiating Variety from Complexity
2.3 Organization Forms that Manage a Given Outcome Variety
2.4 Capability Renewal of Mark II Multinationals
2.4.1 Intermediate Institution
2.4.2 Capability Renewal of Mark II Firms
3 Subsequent Competition in the Urban Contexts
3.1 The Involvement of Other Industrial Science Categories
3.1.1 Starting from Mark II Sciences to Recombine with Emerging Sciences
3.1.2 Starting from Chemical Mark II to Enhance to Other Categories
3.1.3 Starting from Architectural Engineering Science
3.2 Subsequent Competition in the Urban Context
4 New Science-Intensive Category
References
6 Artificial Intelligence to Broaden Beneficiaries
1 New and Established Science Categories
2 New Vehicle of Tier-II Translation
2.1 New Image of Tier-II Translation
2.1.1 The Specific Property of AI-Driven Sciences
2.2 Application to Urban Resilience Models and Practices
2.2.1 Challenges Passed on to the Twenty-First Century
2.2.2 Adoption of AI in the Tier-II Translation
3 How Algorithms Affect Organizations
3.1 Shift of Desired Skills of Humans
3.2 Human Tasks in Measuring Environmental Exposure
3.3 Impacts on Organizations
3.3.1 Potential Impacts on Resilience Practices
4 More Inclusive Organizations
References
Part III Revolution of Beneficiaries
7 Scale-up of Social Enterprises
1 Significance of Scale-up
2 Replication to Other Settings
2.1 Adaptation Costs to Firms
2.2 Productive Assets
2.3 Case Observations
2.3.1 The Case of an Academic Knowledge-Intensive Organization
2.3.2 The Case of Social Entrepreneurial Firm
3 Governance to Support Scale-up
3.1 Modification of Framework
3.1.1 The educational Program of Academic KIOs
3.2 Social Entrepreneurial Organizations
4 New Categorization
References
8 Strategy and Governance
1 Issues Present
2 Voice of Silence
2.1 Urban Resilience Through Entrepreneurship
2.1.1 Definition of Urban Resilience
2.1.2 Remaining Problems in a Resilience Setting
2.1.3 Management and Organizational Roles in the Resilience
2.1.4 Two Conflicting Theories from Scholarly Management Viewpoints
2.1.5 Corporate Entrepreneurship and Anchor Organizations
2.1.6 Academic Knowledge-Intensive Organizations as the Necessary Condition
2.2 Necessary Component to Add to New Industrial Sciences
2.2.1 Attributes of Sustainability
2.2.2 Organizational Arrangements to Add Variety
2.2.3 From the Efficiency of the Transaction to Transformation
3 Governance for Broadening Beneficiaries
3.1 Urban Planning Viewpoints
3.1.1 Stages to Broaden Beneficiaries
3.1.2 Organization Forms that Will Further Enhance Beneficiaries
4 Vision of Heterogeneous Knowledge Variation
References
Index