Dare to Question

Making an Informed Choice The vaccine paradigm is based upon an assumption that injecting a complex mixture of biological and neurotoxic substances will protect humans from infectious disease. While there is evidence that some vaccines have been effective in the suppression of disease symptoms, the total impact of the artificial stimulation of the human immune system has not been adequately investigated and is not well understood or established. The artificial immunization program was developed more than two hundred years ago when virtually nothing was known about the impact of injecting complex biochemical substances, foreign DNA, and toxins on organs, the neurological and immune systems, and at the cellular level. Today, we have irrefutable evidence that the ingredients in vaccines can and do cause harm, even death. This is evidenced by the more than $4.1 billion in compensation paid to vaccine-injured individuals in the United States by the US National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. 1 And we know this amount represents only a small fraction of the total number of vaccine injury victims who are rarely acknowledged, much less compensated. As more evidence of vaccine injury is acknowledged, there is increasing consideration being given by parents and some medical professionals to modify the recommended CDC vaccine schedule. Is it reasonable to propose a modified or delayed vaccine schedule in response to vaccine injury? Or is it time to question the very basis of the artificial immune stimulation program? This book is written by a parent and is for parents. I’ve spent more than thirty years reviewing the vaccine literature. ‘Dare to Question’ offers an overview of the many questions and concerns related to the practice of artificial immune stimulation, more commonly referred to as vaccination.