Contesting Modernity in the German Secularization Debate: Karl Löwith, Hans Blumenberg and Carl Schmitt in Polemical Contexts

Introduction
1. ‘A Tale of Two Churches’
2. Postsecular Critiques of Progress and Secularization
3. A Return to the German Secularization Debate
Part 1. Karl Löwith and Hans Blumenberg
Chapter 1. The Löwith-Blumenberg Debate: From Overlapping Aversions to Fundamental Differences
1. Introduction
2. Blumenberg’s Account
3. Löwith’s Account
4. Reevaluation of Blumenberg’s Critique
5. Agreements and Disagreements: Suggestions from Secondary Literature
6. Underlying Differences in the Philosophies of Löwith and Blumenberg
7. Conclusion
Part 2. The Polemics between Carl Schmitt, Karl Löwith and Hans Blumenberg
Chapter 2. The Political Theology of Carl Schmitt: Secularization, Eschatology and Enmity
1. Introduction
2. Differing Interpretations of Schmitt and His Philosophical Style
3. The Concept of the Political and Decisionism
4. Political Theology and Theory of Secularization
5. The Theological ‘Core’ of Schmitt’s Thought?
6. Philosophy of History and Critique of Modernity
7. Eschatology: Schmitt and the Katechon
8. Schmitt’s Stasiology: The Identity of the Political and Theological
9. Conclusion
Chapter 3. The Löwith-Schmitt Debate on Nihilism and Faith: Critique, Post-war Diplomacy and Mutual Suspicion
1. Introduction
2. Löwith’s Critique of Schmitt
3. Assessment of Löwith’s Critique
4. Schmitt’s Attempted Rapprochement and Covert Critique of Löwith
5. Löwith versus Schmitt: Antithetical Theologies
6. Conclusion
Chapter 4. The Blumenberg-Schmitt Debate and the ‘Front against Political Theology’
1. Introduction
2. Exchange: ‘Legitimacy of the Modern Age’ versus ‘Political Theology’
3. Schmitt: A United Front against Political Theology?
4. Blumenberg: A ‘Weak Decisionism’ and Turn to Polytheism
5. Assessment: A United Front or Different Lines of Contestation?
6. Conclusion
Part 3. Three Perspectives on the Broader Secularization Debate
Chapter 5. Historiography: The Secularization Debate as ‘Ideenpolitik’
1. Introduction
2. The Anti-Enlightenment Camp: Kesting and Koselleck as Followers of Schmitt and Löwith
3. The Pro-Enlightenment Camp: Kamlah and Jaeschke as Followers of Blumenberg
4. Investigating and Problematizing ‘Secularization’: Lübbe and Zabel
5. Conclusion
Chapter 6. Theology: The Roots of Modernity and the Metaphorics of Secularization
1. Introduction
2. Theological Views on Secularization
3. Modernity and Christianity: Voegelin
4. History and Christianity: Bultmann
5. Overview and Evaluation
6. Conclusion
Chapter 7. Politics: Between Heresy and Paganism, the Struggle over Political Theology between Jacob Taubes and Odo Marquard
1. Introduction
2. Walter Benjamin and the Rediscovery of Messianism
3. The Political Theology of Jacob Taubes
4. Liberal Conservatism against the New Left: The Ritter School
5. The ‘Political Poly-Theology’ of Odo Marquard
6. Evaluation and Reflection
7. Conclusion
Part 4. Methodological Reflection
Chapter 8. Understanding the Secularization Debate: Geistesgeschichte and Essentially Contested Concepts
1. Introduction
2. Parallels between the Secularization Debate and Postsecularism
3. Geistesgeschichte and Essentially Contested Concepts
4. The Functions of Geistesgeschichte
5. ‘Intellectual Virtues’ and Criteria for Judgement
6. Application of Rorty’s Model to the Secularization Debate
7. Guidelines and Gallie’s Pluralist Ethic
8. Conclusion
Conclusion
Bibliography
Index